An Open Letter to “Subcontinental” Tech Recruiters

This is an open-letter rant directed at job recruiters for the IT field who are of …*ahem* … “Subcontinental” origin. If you are not in the IT field, are not looking for new job opportunities, or do not appreciate the use of harsh words directed at people of non-European origin, then you might want to skip this offering. Otherwise, feel free to read on. I would enjoy hearing from you if you agree, or have any practical solutions to this problem.

Dear Apu/Bapu/Gupta/Rajneesh/Sanjeet, or Whatever the Hell Your Name Is:

I have a serious bone to pick with you. I know I am not alone in having this set of complaints about you, but I am probably one of the few who is willing to let you know about it, in the language and tone in which you deserve to hear it. I would gladly do so using my real name. In fact, have come very close to sounding off on you when I’ve inadvertently answered your annoying, pestering phone calls. However, given the ultra-sensitive age in which we live, and knowing the near monopoly that you and your co-ethnics now have on this profession, I will take the low road and stay anonymous for the present.

Let me start off by saying that it is difficult for me to believe that you take your job seriously. Why do I say this? Because if you have spent any time in the real working world at all, you would know without even having to be told that clear and effective communication is essential to getting anything accomplished, in any job and at any level of employment. If you cannot communicate effectively with coworkers, superiors, or clients, then you accomplish nothing meaningful and are thus not only superfluous to your company, but an impediment to its mission and profitability. So what do you hope to accomplish by not being able to communicate clearly with people who, if you are able to work with them successfully and get them what they want, will earn you a paycheck? The message you send by not clearly communicating is that you are either salaried, with pay not tied to performance (doubtful); or that you do what you do as a sort of childish hobby (even more doubtful).

By communication, I mean both the written and oral form. I realize that English is not your native language (although, being an “educated” Subcontinental, you should have started learning it in early childhood and thus had more than sufficient opportunity to put it to daily use). However, if you are going to work in a profession where it is the de facto global business language, then not being able to communicate effectively in it is going to cripple you over the long term. The following is an extract of an email that I received from you earlier this week for a position that you mistakenly thought I would be interested in or was a fit for (more on that shortly):

“Helo [sic] [feeriker],


“Trust all well at your end.

“Please find below job description and reply me with you [sic] Updated resume and Salary expectation if you be [sic] interested.”

This is typical of the spam that you send me, sometimes three or more times per week. Apparently you also believe that lack of an immediate response means “he’s in shock and awe at the unrivaled opportunity I’ve just sent him and is too overcome with gratitude to answer right away,” rather than “he’s not interested and just wants you to bugger off.” But even if I were interested in what you were offering, please tell me: Why would I bother to even pay an extra second’s attention to something as poorly written as your email? Why would I believe that someone like you who is fundamentally unable to communicate in clear, simple English has any influence that would be able to connect me with the position?

Here’s another question: How would you react if I were to send you a similarly written piece of garbage, in English or one of the two dozen major Subcontinental languages, asking you to find me a position? Would you immediately think “Hey, I’ve found a real pearl among swine here! Let me drop everything else I’m doing right now and put him in contact with my most important clients right away!” I’m wagering that the answer to that question is no, and that you would waste ZE-RO seconds directing your typing finger to the DELETE button on your inbox. So why then do you similarly assume that the typical job seeker would be desperate enough to pay any attention to a recruiter who can’t even correctly write a pair of simple sentences in plain English?

Your inability to communicate is also probably directly related to your lack of attention to detail. I constantly read and hear recruiters of all levels of experience and ethnic backgrounds bitch, moan, and whine about how much time it takes to “slog through several million resumes.” Leaving aside the fact that that’s part of your freaking JOB, you lazy son of a bitch, it also speaks to either an inability or lack of desire to learn how to use an Applicant Tracking System (ATS) correctly. These applications are highly configurable and can be set up to produce reports that are based on certain key pieces of information contained in a resume, selected in accordance with the client’s hiring criteria. HOWEVER, there is no escaping the fact that you are going to have to do some analysis on this second-tier information. You will have to refine the application’s reporting engine to identify potential applicants who have the specific skills, background, and experience your client is looking for. That is to say, information that simply key words or phrases plucked out of a resume during a tier-one search will NOT give you.  This, along with subsequent “eyeball” analysis of the results, does indeed take LOTS of time. However, if you really want to earn your paycheck by providing your client with as near to a perfect match for the position as there is, there is no way to avoid doing this additional work.  The fact that you obviously do NOT do it, that the position notices that you send out to potential applicants are obviously nothing more than the results of a first-tier keyword search, shows that you are either too incompetent or too lazy (probably both) to do the due diligence that needs to be done. Maybe you can answer another question for me here: Why is it that, of the two successful job placements I’ve had from third party recruiters, real professionals who actually took the time to read my resume carefully and match me with the ideal position their clients needed filled, BOTH of them were white American males? I know the answer to this, as do you, which is …

You only even bother contacting non-Subcontinental potential job candidates to avoid U.S. Department of Labor laws dealing with job discrimination. Any of us non-Subcontinentals who have spent even so much as a day working with or (Dear God forbid) for your fellow Subcontinentals knows that you prefer your own at all costs. Any company stupid enough to put one of you in the position of having the final say in hiring (and there are many such companies in the tech field these days) will never hire any employees who are non-Subcontinentals, no matter how ideally qualified for the open positions they are. There is nothing more breathtaking (and entertaining, to be honest) as a white European male than to observe non-European technology professionals of non-Subcontinental origin seething in their well-justified hatred for you people and your blatant nepotism. I know one thing: the next war between China and India will not be a nuclear military confrontation, but a labor confrontation in the technology industry in the United States. A nuclear Word War III will be peaceful by comparison. Either way, you really should be thankful that the whole H1B Visa scam is working in your favor. Enjoy it while you can, because upon the impending outbreak of the Second American Revolution you are all going to be unemployed and probably looking desperately for the first boat back to the Subcontinent before lynch mob justice catches up to you.

So please, just stop reaching out to white American IT professionals. It’s an insulting waste of our time, and certainly of yours as well, to say nothing of the needless delays it causes your clients in filling positions. And please, PLEASE, for freak’s sake, stop using European names when you write or call us!  If you had any idea how ridiculous it makes you look and sound, you would go into self-imposed exile out of a sense of shame and embarrassment. If no one else has had the guts to tell you, let me be the first: NOBODY is fooled, NOBODY is amused, and it just makes you lose what little credibility you might have had faster than if you had just been upfront and stayed plain ol’ Gupta, Bapu, or Sanjay. We still probably wouldn’t give you the time of day, but we wouldn’t necessarily summarily dismiss you out of hand, either.

So in closing, my personal message to you is “FOALMA” (“F*** Off and Leave Me Alone!”). Rude and unprofessional? Sure. But tell me, given what I’ve just described, why you think you deserve professional courtesy, and why I should pretend that you’re interested in placing me in a job that satisfies both me and your client. The fact that you make in-house recruiters, incompetent HR stumble-bums that they are, look honorable and able by comparison speaks to just how wretched your kind is.

Meanwhile, I look forward to finishing the rest of my certification training goals shortly, milestones that will enable me to establish myself as an independent consultant, obliterate any professional online profiles that are magnets for your sorry kind, and never deal with any of you again except possibly as clients, and even then only on MY terms.

Have a nice life.


Published by feeriker

Just an ordinary, flawed man grateful for the redemptive blood of Jesus who struggles to extend the forgiveness and understanding to others with which he has been blessed.

13 thoughts on “An Open Letter to “Subcontinental” Tech Recruiters

  1. Reblogged this on Patriactionary and commented:
    Great rant, feeriker! 🙂

    I am mystified by online / telephone spam and scams; sad to think that they must work with enough people, however few, to make them economically worth carrying them out…

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks, Will. It just mystifies me why these clowns waste their time, knowing that no fruit will come of it (and thus no money in their pockets). If the business model they’re compelled to operate under is centered on getting paid by the number of cold calls they make, or spam emails they send to potential candidates, that makes even LESS sense!


  2. I’m pretty sure the horrible grammar and punctuation is on purpose, since I’ve seen people from top 20 US universities do it, and they surely would have noticed at some point. I think it’s a form of ritual disrespect for the English language, plus marking their territory.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Indians are actually the most economically successful ethnic group in the US, bar none :

    The phone scammers are probably located in India itself. The return probably isn’t worthwhile for someone who is already here.

    Plus, you seem to be conflating phone scammers with the tech recruiters employed at a company. Whatever your personal dislike of their race/ethnicity, that is an honest living.


    1. Plus, you seem to be conflating phone scammers with the tech recruiters employed at a company.

      Reading comprehension check. Here is the relevant passage again:

      The fact that you make in-house recruiters, incompetent HR stumble-bums that they are, look honorable and able by comparison speaks to just how wretched your kind is.

      Very clearly I was comparing third party recruiters, NOT “scam artists,” unfavorably with in-house recruiters who are employees of the company they’re recruiting for, usually HR staff.

      So are YOU conflating ALL third party recruiters with phone scammers? Are you saying that there are NO legitimate third party recruiters who happen to hail from India who work in the U.S.? That’s what your statement seems to imply. Where Sucbcontinentals in that type of job are concerned, I’m willing to entertain your assertion as 100 percent fact based on experience.

      However, if your assertion is that there are no legitimate third party recruiters PERIOD, then it fails to explain how two non-Subcontinental third party recruiters managed to successfully place me in good positions.

      Or are you simply trying to say that there is no way in hell that Indians would ever recruit non-Indians for a technology position, whether it’s in the USA, India, or on the moon, and that any European or American who answers their emails or calls in anticipation of an honest shot at employment is a clueless chump? That I could also easily accept as true. If that’s what you mean to say, I appreciate the attempt at candor.

      Whatever your personal dislike of their race/ethnicity, that is an honest living.

      WHAT exactly are you describing as an “honest living,” now that I’ve clarified for you my statement on in-house versus Third Party recruiters? Are saying that spamming and cold calling potential applicants with job offers that one either cannot fill or has no intention of filling, or that don’t exist is an honest living? I guess if you’re a Subcontinental it certainly would be considered as such. The Western World, however, begs to differ.


  4. I also do not understand the idea of taking a job, where I lack the skill to do one of the primary duties.
    For a recruiter, being able to communicate clearly is surely one of the primary duties, right?

    On the topic of grammar, a few corrections 🙂
    information that simply key words — simple key words
    take LOTS of time — take large amounts of time (lots is incorrect here, unless you are thinking of an auction house)

    Good article


  5. I’ve often gotten requests from CyberCoders. My guess is that they’re just asking me for the purposes you outlined, Feeriker. I haven’t replied to one in years, since I never hear when someone RUDELY sends me an email, I respond, and they never reply. Eff them.

    But the sort of keyword-based tracking systems you talk about are fundamentally broken. Better you should use the “logical gate” that Liz Ryan recommends. But that means applying skill and judgment, and not rewriting your resume to match all the keywords in the ad like a primitive code monkey. We could eliminate that sort of idiocy quickly.


    1. Liz Ryan does indeed offer a lot of very valuable advice. She recently came out with an article on the advantages of independent consulting that, while all I had time to do was skim it quickly, I thought was spot-on. Alas, I’ll have to dig for the link to it, as the email in which it appeared seems to have gotten lost in the inbox shuffle.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Create your website with
Get started
%d bloggers like this: